Skip to content

June 16, 2013

12

Man of Steel

by Franz Patrick


Man of Steel (2013)
★★★★ / ★★★★

During Krypton’s final convulsions due to the planet’s increasingly unstable core, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife (Antje Traue) rush to get their son, Kal-El, into a pod so he alone can escape the doomed planet and prevent the Kryptonian race from reaching extinction. This task is not made any easier by General Zod (Michael Shannon) as he and and his henchmen stage a coup d’état against the planet’s leaders. Zod wants the codex in his possession because it holds the genetic information of his people. Having it will allow him to recolonize another planet. But the codex is in the pod–located inside the infant to be exact–and Jor-El will not allow his son to be harmed.

To claim that “Man of Steel,” based on the screenplay by David S. Goyer and directed by Zack Snyder, is visually spectacular and consistently thrilling is not an understatement. Propelled by a confident execution and an above average script, when the film reaches emotional apices, especially in the first half, it makes for a compelling watch. It drags a bit toward the end, favoring ostentatiously grandiose action sequences over substance, but it is far from similar to the incomprehensible cling-clanging denouement of Michael Bay’s “Transformers.”

One of the wisest techniques employed is the non-linear storytelling. While this is not new to the superhero sub-genre, it is effective here. By choosing only the important moments of Kal-El, named Clark Kent (Cooper Timberline, Dylan Sprayberry in his younger years and Henry Cavill as an adult) by his adoptive family (Kevin Costner, Diane Lane), learning to control his powers, keeping a cool temper, and trying to keep his abilities and identity a secret, the small lessons are contained and to the point so they do not disrupt the rhythm of Clark’s journey toward discovering his origins.

I enjoyed the casting of Lois Lane. She is played by Amy Adams who, in my eyes, is not conventionally pretty. I think she is beautiful but her beauty comes with an edge. For me to be convinced that Lois is a serious journalist, one who can go toe-to-toe with the sharks in the Daily Planet and among its competitors, the actor playing her has to have the look as well as the capability to evoke conviction and intelligence. Adams is ace casting because she embodies these qualities.

However, the romance between Superman and Lois Lane is not handled with grace. There is a kiss that occurs near the end that felt like a knife to my stomach. Even when they stand from each other, silent, only a couple of inches apart, I cringed a little bit. The intimacy is not earned. Their relationship, one that is romantic in nature, is far from fully developed. And yet it is forced. A kiss between the two leads does not deserve a place in this movie. Perhaps a hug would have been acceptable–but only as a symbol of thanks.

The smashing of and crashing against buildings, helicopters, and alien ships are impressive. The first few big action pieces, especially the battle in Smallville between Superman against Faora (Antje Traue) and a robotic but very intimidating minion, offer genuine thrills. It is good that our hero is not made out to be invincible; he can feel pain and exhaustion–without being exposed to Kryptonite, an ore infamous for being Superman’s ultimate weakness. To circumvent the expected, the writer is forced to be a little more creative and I appreciated that.

Still, the explosions, skyscrapers crashing onto each other, and flying debris wear out their welcome eventually. Because it runs for longer than is necessary, I began to consider that perhaps the film might have been better off as having a hard R rating. Though it is implied, not one human death that includes all of its ugliness is shown. For example, when a structure is about to crash onto a group of panicking people desperate for escape, it quickly cuts onto another scene. If human casualty is shown once in a while, it might have made a stronger statement, one that is relevant to Superman’s journey of becoming a symbol of the human race. It would have shown that death of the innocent is a part of the story’s universe and that not even Superman can save everybody.

Despite a handful of missteps, “Man of Steel” is an action sci-fi fantasy that has more than enough gravitational pull in its marrow to keep us wondering about what will happen–within its story as well as a potential franchise. I want a sequel–one that is leaner, maybe laced with more humor, clever ones, but certainly one that does not flinch away from the uncomfortable.

Advertisements
12 Comments Post a comment
  1. Jun 16 2013

    Glad you liked it Franz, I loved it :D

    Might want to change the image at the top, it isn’t loading.

    Reply
    • Jun 16 2013

      Weird. It works fine using my computer and my phone.

      Will check out your review later!

      Reply
  2. GaryLee828
    Jun 16 2013

    I liked this movie a lot; I think a lot had to do with Zimmer’s score, that is epic as usual!

    One thing I’d like to point out, that I also mentioned on Mark’s MOS entry is that the first “Transformers” was actually very good! The first installment had a lot of heart, and to me the core of the story was a love story, but not between Sam and Kayla – but a friendship between Sam and Bumblebee. When Bumblebee was captured and about to be demolished you could feel the emotion of Sam’s sadness, and could even feel that Bumblebee, although a machine, had feelings and emotions just as humans do; i also got that from the robot on “I-Robot” with Will Smith and from the Aliens on “District 9”. To me, what really made “Transformers” so good was the heart it displayed, specifically with Sam & Bumblebee – and then Steve Jablonsky’s score was awesome! It felt like a Hans Zimmer production.

    Where Transformers went totally wrong was in part 2 when it took away from the heart of the story and tried to get cute and funny with the robots, and other lame characters; it just totally fell flat – and while part 3 was an improvement, the heart was never recovered from the original. But hey, even though Transformers 2 & 3 weren’t up-to-par, Jablonsky’s score was awesome (and different) in the entire franchise! So, at least if they make a Transformers 4 I will look forward to another stellar score from Jablonsky who has thus far not disappointed. The movie? I doubt if I will even go see.

    Reply
    • Jun 24 2013

      I did like the score, too. Especially the ones meant to be moving (the sadness kind as opposed to thrill).

      I agree with you that the first “Transformers” movie is good. I liked it until the last 20 to 30 minutes with all the metallic drivel. Until then there was a story and I could actually tell what was going on. BUT when the robots started fighting, I stopped caring.

      As for the sequels, the studios should have donated the budget to cancer research.

      Reply
  3. Jun 17 2013

    HELL YES! Will have my review up this week, but boy am I happy to see we’re on the same page. Seems like the masses a smidge divided on this one.

    Reply
  4. Jun 19 2013

    I didn’t respond to the action set pieces. I think what makes a Superhero film exciting is the human melodrama not special effects. Plus the story was ridiculously difficult to follow. Did some put the film on “shuffle?” lol So many flashbacks.

    Reply
    • Jun 24 2013

      I wish I can agree. I think that a superhero movie with minimal visual and/or special effects and magnified melodrama is essentially called a chamber piece. Who would want to see that? (…Okay, me, maybe, out of curiosity.)

      Also, I did not find the narrative difficult to follow at all. I enjoyed that the childhood and teen years are inserted between the build-up prior to Kal-El finding the ship. I found them to be controlled, functioning as reminders of the lessons Kal-El learned from his human father prior to meeting his biological one.

      Reply
  5. Jun 20 2013

    Great review. :-) You were far more kind than I was! But we agree on certain things. I too am looking forward to a better sequel. This movie was a good start but we need better next time…

    Reply
    • Jun 24 2013

      Kind?! …You mean “fair”? ;) Haha.

      I will take a look a at your review in a bit.

      Reply

Feel free to leave a comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: