Skip to content

October 16, 2013

7

V/H/S/2

by Franz Patrick


V/H/S/2 (2013)
★★ / ★★★★

I hated “V/H/S” so much, I was not sure I could stomach a sequel. However, I abide by a personal code of giving every film a chance so I leapt into “V/H/S/2,” composed of four segments and one unifier, feeling optimistic and willing to be impressed. In some ways, I was. There is a hidden gem here that deserves to be made into a full-length feature film.

“Tape 49,” the unifier, is not that segment. On the contrary, it is the least developed and most predictable of the bunch. Although it has potential because it involves two private investigators (Lawrence Michael Levine, Kelsy Abbott) who are looking for a college student that has gone missing, the writer-director, Simon Barrett, gives his characters neither engrossing detective work nor a functioning brain when turn of events bring up red flags. For a pair of detectives, it is most frustrating that they lack common sense.

The diamond in the rough is “Safe Haven,” written by Timo Tjahjanto and and Gareth Evans. It involves a documentary crew interviewing a leader of a cult (Epy Kusnandar). The latter is convinced that it would be a good idea for the filmmakers to be invited into the very private community, who believe they are on a journey to immortality, so that they can capture the truth and show the world that their faith is good and pure.

I watched the segment in complete fascination. Its turn of events reminded me of off-the-wall Japanese horror–the willingness and the energy to be creative and entertain. For twenty minutes, I experienced a spectrum of emotion, from being tickled by the greenness of the crew to horrified by what is being shown on screen. Yes, it gets violent and bloody but there is a method in the way it builds from serenity to convulsing madness. I could not help but wonder what Tjahjanto and Evans can do if they were given an hour and a half or so to develop their characters and helm the thematic elements.

Solid work can be found in Adam Wingard’s “Phase I Clinical Trials.” It tells the story of a man, played by Wingard, who has just received a prosthetic eye that records every single thing he sees or does. Though it grants him the gift of sight, there is a catch. The premise is similar to Oxide Pang Chun and Danny Pang’s “Gin gwai,” which makes it somewhat predictable, but there is a freshness in the way it takes its time to build. The extra beat or two of delay prior to the jolt matters when the mood is tense.

The two remaining segments, Eduardo Sánchez and Gregg Hale’s “A Ride in the Park” and Jason Eisner’s “Slumber Party Alien Abduction” are more comedic than thrilling or scary, but they have their moments, too. It is an excellent decision to sandwich them between more serious work in order to prevent the mood and tone to go stale.

I enjoyed “V/H/S/2” because each part is able to offer something different to the table. While one or two of them is not great work by any means, as a whole it is a much brighter and more memorable compilation than its predecessor. Unlike the egregious “V/H/S,” there is not one segment here that comes off as an affront to the art of filmmaking. You get the feeling that this time the writers and directors strive to make something they can be proud of.

Advertisements
7 Comments Post a comment
  1. Oct 16 2013

    Not as good as the first, but you can that they’re definitely putting their feet in the right direction. Good review Franz.

    Reply
    • Oct 19 2013

      I’ll read your take on it because I really felt like this one has more ambition and is more successful in hitting the marks. The first one was boring to me with the exception of Ti West’s segment.

      Reply
  2. GaryLee828
    Oct 18 2013

    Ugh, I thought this one sucked! Every segment was the exact same formula. Someone unknowingly enters into danger, and then they are chased by some lame adversary. Same thing EVERY story!! Stupid, lame and predictable! I also didn’t like VHS, either.

    But a couple dudes on here did “You’re Next” and I think that was good. You should see that one and write a review. :)

    Reply
    • Oct 19 2013

      But isn’t that the conceit of just about every horror movie?

      I don’t know, I guess I was able to see the differences because I was more concerned about the texture, the mood, whether I was scared (and to what extent), and type of danger the characters are thrusted into. I enjoyed it quite a bit–that’s a lot more than I can say about the predecessor! I distinctly remember writing that review and being so upset. lol

      Absolutely, I already have “You’re Next” on my queue. Quite excited for it, actually. :)

      Reply
    • davecrewe
      Oct 27 2013

      I agree with both the original review – in that “Safe Haven” and Wingard’s segment, the former in particular, were clear highlight – but I will concede GaryLee828’s point that there’s a repetition to these chapters that wasn’t present in the first film (which I quite liked, though the sequel is undeniably stronger). It would have been nice for one of the films to have a substantial twist, rather than four stories that all revolve around establishing character and setting, then establishing antagonists, then a bunch of scenes revolving around violence and/or people hiding/fleeing the villains.

      Reply
      • Oct 29 2013

        In retrospect, I’m beginning to see (a little bit) why the repetition is problematic. I guess I was blind to it because I really, really hated the first one and, with the sequel, I wanted it to not be a waste of time. Still, though, I had a good time when a segment was working as a whole.

        Reply
        • davecrewe
          Oct 30 2013

          Yeah, it’s hardly the kind of problem that ruins the film, and it’s perhaps to be expected given by all accounts the filmmakers produced their segments individually. Still, I felt as though the first film, while it may not have had as strong sequences in a vacuum, had a better rhythm to it; even if a particular chapter was sub-par, it felt distinct from the chapters surrounding it.

          Reply

Feel free to leave a comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: